ABSTRACT
[Objective]:
To compare the effects of Xuezhikang and Simvastatin in patients
with primary hyperlipidemia. Methods 108 patients with primary hyperlipidemia
were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1,53 patients, took
4 Xuezhikang capsules per day (1.2g/day) for 8 weeks and Group 2,
55 patients took Simvastatin 10 mg per day for 8 weeks. At the end
of 8 weeks, the lipid levels were compared with those of the baseline
in each group. Results In Group 1,the serum levels of total cholesterol
(TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglycerides
(TG)decreased by 23.0%,28.0% and 28.1%(P<0.001),and in Group
2 reduced by 23.3%,29.5% and 29.5%(P<0.001) respectively. The
serum levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol after
taking Xuezhikang increased by 5.0%(P>0.05) and after taking
Simvastatin increased by 14.3%(P<0.01). No significant differences,
however, were found between the two groups in TC, LDL cholesterol,
TG, and HDL cholesterol. The side effects of Xuezhikang were less
than those of Simvastatin. Conclusion: Xuezhikang made in China
is a safe, effective and well toleraled lipid modulator.
[Key Words]: Hyperlipidemia Xuezhikang
Simvastatin
INTRODUCTION
Xuezhikang is produced and refined with modern biotech methods.
Researches have demonstrated that Xuezhikang comprises HMG-CoA reductase
inhibitor, various unsaturated fatty acids and amino acids, which
are essential to human beings. Xuezhikang has been shown in several
animal models of hyperlipidemia to inhibit the increase in total
cholesterol (TC), LDL cholesterol and triglyceride (TG).1 Acute
and chronic toxicity studies have shown that Xuezhikang is well
tolerated even at the dose much higher than the effective one.2
Clinical studies have also demonstrated that Xuezhikang significantly
reduces serum plasma TC,LDL cholesterol and TG.
No
significant changes in electrocardiograms or clinical laboratory
measurements were observed previously.3,4 We compared Xuezhikang
and Simvastatin in terms of safety parameters and efficacy of lowering
lipid and lipoprotein in patients with hypercholesterolemia.
METHODS
From
October 1995 to February 1996, 108 patients with primary hyperlipidemia
were enrolled. They discontinued and medication for hyperlipidemia
within 2 months and received dietary advice for 4 weeks. Eligible
patients were recruited if their serum TC was =5.96 mmol/L and /or
their TG was 2.26-4.52 mmol/L. In addition, the high-density lipoprotein
(HDL) cholesterol was =1.04 mmol/L for men or =1.16 mmol/L for women.
Patients
were excluded from this trial if in the last 6 months they had such
conditions as myocardial infarction, stroke, severe trauma or major
surgery, nephritic syndrome, hypothyroidism, acute or chronic hepatobi
liary disorders, diabetes mellitus or gout. Women of childbearing
or breast-feeding were also inegligible. According to the pretreatment
TC and TG values, the patients were randomized into two groups.
Clinical
design
The
patients were treated by a single-blinded method. The treatment
group was given Xuezhiking 0.6g twice a day (1.2g/d) for 8 weeks.
The positive control group was treated with Simvastatin 10 mg every
day at bedtime. Throughout the trial, all patients were asked to
maintain their normal life styles, and dietary habits as suggested
by physicians 4 weeks before the trial. Medications were allowed
during the trial except those that could affect serum lipids.
Assessment
of hypolipidemic efficacy
Serum lipids (TC, TG, and HDL cholesterol) were measured
after fasting for at least 12 hours before enrollment and at the
end of 4 and 8 weeks of the trial. Serum lipid measurements and
other tests were performed in the laboratory, Division of Coronary
Heart Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, CAMS. The quality control samples
were used in the analyses of TC, TG and HDL cholesterol. The coefficient
of variance (CV) for all of the three tests was less than 5%.The
level of LDL cholesterol was calculated according to Friedewald
equation: LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) =TC-(HDL cholesterol+TG/2.2).
The general efficacy was also assessed by an integrated analysis
of improvement of serum lipids. The criteria for the assessment
were as follows: highly effective: changes in serum lipids after
treatment meet at least one of the followings: TC reduced=20%,TG
reduced=40%, and HDL cholesterol increased=0.26mmol/L; effective:
changes in serum lipids after the treatment meet at least one of
the following: TC reduced from=10% to < 20%, TG reduced from
=20% to < 40%, and HDL cholesterol increased from=0.10mmol/L
to < 0.26mmol/L; ineffective: post treatment serum lipids is
not changed or below the criteria for the rating of efficacy; deterioration:
changes in serum lipids after the treatment meet at least one of
the followings: TC or TG increased=10%, and HDL cholesterol reduced=0.10mmol/L.
Assessment
of safety
The
patients visited the clinic before the trial and 4 and 8 weeks after
the treatment. Their compliance, general physical health, and symptoms
were assessed on each visit. Physical examination (body weight,
heart rate and rhythm, liver and spleen palpation), electrocardiography
(ECG),and tests of complete blood counts, serum alanine aminotransferase
(ALT),blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), glucose, and creatine
kinase(CK)and urinalysis were performed before and 8 weeks after
the treatment.
Statistical
analysis
The data were analyzed by using the statistical software package,
expressed as mean x±s. Student's t test was used to analyze
the quantitative data, with the group t test for comparison of the
data from the two groups, and paired t teat for comparison of continuous
variables before and after the treatment. Chi-square test (odds
ratio) was used to analyzing the qualitative data and the Breslow-Day
test to analyze the homogeneity of odds ratios for the two groups.
RESULTS
Baseline
characteristics
Of
the 108 patients, 67(62%) were male. Their average age was 55.8
years (range: 30 to 79 years). Fifty patients had a history of hypertension,
and 18 had coronary heart diseases (angina pectoris or myocardial
infarction). No statistical differences between Xuzhikang and Simvastatin
recipients were noted with regard to demographic or cardiovascular
risk factors.
Effect of treatment on serum lipid and lipoprotein
Among the 108 patients, 96(47 in the Xuezhikang group and 49 in
the Simvastatin group) had pretreatment TC=5.96 mmol/L. In the 108
patients (53 in the Xuzhikang group and 55 in the Simvastatin group)
with pretreatment serum LDL cholesterol=3.58mmol/L, 57(29 in the
Xuezhikang group and 28 in the Simvastatin group) had pretreatment
serum TG=2.26 to =4.52 mmol/L, and 45 (23 in the Xuezhikang group
and 22 in the Simvastatin group) had pretreatment serum HDL cholesterol<1.08
mmol/L. The ratio of non-HDL cholesterol (TC-HDL cholesterol) to
HDL cholesterol was calculated for the 108 patients (53 in the Xuezhikang
group and 55 in the Simvastatin group). After 4 and 8 weeks of the
treatment, the lipid levels were compared with those of the baseline
in each group. In the Xuezhikang group, the serun levels of TC,
LDL cholesterol, TG and the ratio of non-HDL cholesterol to HDL
cholesterol significantly decreased by 20.2%, 23.0%, 26.1% and 28.0%,and
33.3% and 28.1%, 29.3%, 26.5% (P<0.001) respectively. In the
Simvastatin group, they were reduced by 20.5%, 23.3%, 26.1% and
29.5% and 29.4%, 29.5%,30.0% and 30.1%(P<0.001) respectively.
The serum HDL cholesterol increased by 4.0% and 5.0%(p<0.05)
in the Xuezhikang group and 7.3%(P<0.05) and 14.3% (P<0.01)
in the Simvastatin group respectively. No significant differences
were found between the two groups in TC, LDL cholesterol, TG and
HDL cholesterol (Table I).
Table
I. Mean % from baseline in lipid parameters at 8 weeks in patients
taking Xuezhikang or simvastatin |
|
|
|
|
Mean
%
|
|
Group
|
No.
of cases
|
Pretreatment
x±s mmol/L
|
After
4 weeks
|
After
8
weeks
|
Total
Cholesterol |
Xuezhikang
Simvastatin
|
47
49
|
7.23±0.98
7.21±0.95
|
-20.2**
-20.5**
|
-23.0**
-23.3**
|
LDL-Cholesterol
(mmol/L) |
Xuezhikang
Simvastatin
|
53
55
|
4.70±1.06
4.75±1.18
|
-26.1**
-26.1**
|
-28.0**
-29.5**
|
Triglyceride
(mmol/L) |
Xuezhikang
Simvastatin
|
53
55
|
3.13±0.64
2.98±0.59
|
-33.3**
-29.4**
|
-28.1**
-29.5**
|
HDL-Cholesterol
(mmol/L) |
Xuezhikang
Simvastatin
|
23
22
|
0.95±0.11
0.93±0.13
|
+
4.0
+ 7.3
|
+
5.0
+14.3*
|
Ratio
of non-HDLC:
HDL-C |
Xuezhikang
Simvastatin
|
53
55
|
5.12±1.35
5.20±1.58
|
-29.3**
-30.0**
|
-26.5**
-30.1**
|
-:
decrease; +: increase; * P<0.01; ** P<0.001, by paired
t test, as compared with pretreatment values |
Integrated
analysis of effects
The general efficacy of Xuezhikang or Simvastatin
were analyzed. 41 patients in the Xuezhikang group met the criteria
of highly effective and effective. In the Simvastatin group, 43
patients also met the same criteria. The total effective rate was
87.2% in the Xuezhikang group and 87.8% in the Simvastatin group.
No significant difference in the total effective rate was observed
between the two groups (P<0.05).
Table
II. Total effective rate of Xuezhikang and simvastatin |
|
Total
|
No.
of cases (%)
|
P
|
|
|
Highly
effective
|
Effective
|
Ineffective
|
Deterioration
|
Total
effectiveness
|
Total
Cholesterol (=5.96mmol/L)
|
Xuezhikang
|
47
|
26(55.3)
|
15(31.9)
|
4(8.5)
|
2(4.3)
|
41(87.2)
NS
|
Simvastatin
|
49
|
36(73.5)
|
7(14.3)
|
4(8.2)
|
2(4.0)
|
43(87.8)
|
Triglycerides(2.26-4.52
mmol/L)
|
Xuezhikang
|
29
|
11(38.0)
|
7(24.1)
|
7(24.1)
|
4(13.8)
|
18(62.1)
NS
|
Simvastatin
|
28
|
11(39.3)
|
7(25.0)
|
7(25.0)
|
3(10.7)
|
18(64.3)
|
HDL-C
(=1.16mmol/L)
|
Xuezhikang
|
23
|
2(8.7)
|
4(17.4)
|
12(52.2)
|
5(21.7)
|
6(26.1)
NS
|
Simvastatin
|
22
|
4(18.2)
|
9(40.9)
|
8(36.4)
|
1(4.5)
|
13(59.1)
|
Assessment of Safety
Of
the 53 patients who received Xuezhikang for 8 weeks, 2 patients
(3.8%) experienced heartburn and 3 (5%-7%) tiredness. In the Simvastatin
group,3 patients (5.5%) had tiredness, 3 (5.5%) constipation, 1
(1.8%) insomnia, 1 (1.8%) headache and 1 (1.8%) nausea. These symptoms
resolved without specific treatment and all the patients completed
their treatment. None of the 108 patients withdrawn from the trial
developed any symptoms or medical conditions related to the treatment.
No patient in both groups had increased serum ALT level or serum
CK level two times above the upper limit of normal range (normal
range: ALT = 40 IU/L, CK= 200 IU/L respectively), but one patient
who had received the treatment with Simvastatin increased serum
CK level from 15 IU/L to 109 IU/L with myalgia after 8 weeks.
DISCUSSION
Xuezhikang
capsule is a natural HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. Studies have shown
that it significantly reduces the levels of serum TC, and TG as
well as the ratio of non-HDL cholesterol to HDL cholesterol in hyperlipidemia
rabbits and quails. It also can inhibit the formation of atherosclerosis
clot and the deposition of lipid in the liver in hyperlipidemia
rabbits. 324 patients who had received Xuezhikang capsules were
compared with 122 patients who had received Jiaogulan in treating
hyperlipidemia. The result indicated that Xuezhikang capsule can
significantly reduce the level of serum TC, LDL cholesterol, and
TG (23.0%, 28.5% and 36.5% respectively). Xuezhikang capsule is
better than Jiaogulan in regulating lipids3 (P<0.001). Simvastatin
has been proved one of the most potent HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor
in reducing the level of serum TC. A Scandinavian study indicated
that Simvastatin is valuable in reducing the total mortality and
the deaths due to coronary heart disease. We selected Simvastatin
as the positive control drug. There was no significant difference
between Xuezhikang capsule and Simvastatin in reducing the level
of serum TC, LDL cholesterol, TG as well as the ratio of non-HDL
cholesterol to HDL cholesterol (P<0.05). The side effects of
Xuezhikang capsule were less than those of Simvastatin. Four Xuezhikang
capsules per day (1.2g/day) were similar to simvastatin 10 mg per
day in regulating the level of lipids. Xuezhikang capsule is considered
a natural effective lipid modulator.
REFERENCES
1.
|
Zhu
Y,li C, Wang Y. Xuezhikang that lowers blood lipid in rabbits
and quails with hyperlipidemia. China Pharm J 1995; 30: 656 |
2.
|
Li C, Li Y, Hou Z. Toxicology of Xuezhikang. Inf China Pharmacol
Soc 2995; 12: 12. |
|